Source: http://news.feedzilla.com/en_us/stories/politics/top-stories/187900782?client_source=feed&format=rss
aesop alyson hannigan dirt 3 la fitness bayer diamond university of maryland
Thursday, January 19, 2012
Free a Stuck Item in a Vending Machine by Creating a Wave of Air with the Door Flap [Shopping]
The trick is to get your hands under the flap at the retrieval, push it up, and let it snap back quickly. Repeating this motion a few times can sometimes create enough air to help your snack fall out of place when shaking the machine doesn't work (or you don't want to draw attention by doing it). If you're unsuccessful after a few tries you should instead consider calling for help or a refund. Most vending machines have a contact number around the side that you can use to report a stuck item and receive a refund or learn how you can find someone to help you actually retrieve your purchase. It's great if you can get what you paid for without any intervention, but if you can't your best bet is to ask for help.
Photo by TheVectorminator (Shutterstock).
Free a Stuck Item from a Vending Machine | wikiHow
williston north dakota kody brown transylvania terrell owens terrell owens carrie ann inaba california earthquake
Motorola MOTOLUXE and DEFY Mini priced and dated
UK online retailer Clove Technology has just revealed when it expects to ship two new mid-range Motorola phones, along with information on exactly how much each device will set you back.
The Motorola MOTOLUXE, which we saw last week at CES, is due in "late February/early March", for £258 (~$400) including VAT. For your money, you'll get Android 2.3.7 on Motorola's "Moto Switch 2.0" UI, running an 800MHz processor on a 4.0-inch display. The DEFY Mini, which is a more pocketable version of Moto's popular rugged device, is due around the same time as the MOTOLUXE, and can be yours for £175 (~$270).
Hit the source link for pre-order information for both devices, or check out our hands-on with the MOTOLUXE from CES for more on that device.
Source: Clove Technology Blog
 |  |
Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/androidcentral/~3/5HGCEqzvfFM/story01.htm
star trek democracy democracy doctor saab megalodon human centipede
Wednesday, January 18, 2012
HBT: Braves expect Hanson to be ready to go
Tommy Hanson missed the final two months of last season with a partially torn rotator cuff in his right shoulder, suffering multiple setbacks along the way as he unsuccessfully tried to return to the Braves? rotation.
That makes him a big question mark for 2012, but general manager Frank Wren told David O?Brien of the Atlanta Journal Constitution that ?our expectations are that he comes into spring training ready to go.?
Wren added that Hanson ?feels good? and is ?doing really well? in his recovery.
Hanson got knocked around prior to landing on the disabled list, allowing 24 runs in his final 27 innings, including serving up four homers in his last start, yet still posted a 3.60 ERA and 142/46 K/BB ratio in 130 innings overall.
When healthy he?s been one of the most underrated starters in baseball, going 32-22 with a 3.28 ERA in 77 career starts through age 24.
blow i am legend bret michaels bret michaels the unit seabiscuit bob weston
Tuesday, January 17, 2012
Automotive Servicing Guidelines ? Be Sure That Know | Tri-aktiline ...
This article responses your concerns for the what, when, who, why and wherever of automotive servicing guidelines. Important read for anyone motor vehicle proprietors and especially get it done yourselfers.
Precisely What Is Auto Servicing Check list
Auto servicing guidelines is often a typical servicing assessments and simple auto insurance quotes products and services that you desire to use when needed on your motor vehicle to ensure it performs
well and also at peak operation.
Now When Was Auto Servicing Check list Essential
You require automotive servicing guidelines to use prophylactic servicing, dependent for the doctor?s prescription within your auto?s producer as well as specialist auto technician.
Your automotive servicing guidelines should be split into some, good distance within your motor vehicle.
Regular monthly Check list: Check out you acrylic amount, tubes, belts, wheel strain, furnace filter, and so forth.
3-4 months guidelines: Check outVersustransform acrylic and acrylic filtration tworzenie stron Krakow, brake water, transmission water, battery pack terminals and cabling, and so forth.
6 months guidelines: Check outVersustransform shocks, brake, windsheild wiper blades, exhaust program, lighting fixtures, four tires, and so forth.
Your vehicle distinct, producer herbata czerwona specific operator guidebook will tell you what direction to go in the proper time.
Who Will Execute Auto Servicing Check list
Auto servicing guidelines is established to help drivers ?retain? their cars or trucks, to circumvent main break down. Auto servicing guidelines means to suit your needs, if you are a car owner.
Why Execute Auto Servicing Check list: Auto servicing guidelines is important because the quite a few advantages to drivers, which includes, the next It helps in recognition of flaws or damages very early prior to bigger. It cuts down on greatly the price of preserving your motor vehicle. It allows you to ?know? your automobile the harder, as well as acquire utmost remedy for it.
And more?
Through an automotive servicing guidelines is an excellent guidebook for brand spanking new motor vehicle proprietors who wishes to begin diy maintenance employment, it will demonstrate what direction to go, and guidebook them step by step into motor vehicle maintaining and servicing, which is probably the starts in diy automotive servicing employment.
Where You Can Get Auto Servicing Check list You can obtain your guidelines from Your vehicle proprietors guidebook Auto internet sites: They supply effectively created, refined automotive servicing guidelines, and a few have user discussion forums for you to talk with other motor vehicle proprietors, and get genuine talk with automotive professionals.
niespieranokag
Source: http://www.triaktilinedeepwrinklefiller.com/automotive-servicing-guidelines-be-sure-that-know/
dexter facebook timeline kim jong il kim jong il vaclav havel vaclav havel kim jong ii dead
Crash of Falling Russian Spacecraft Imminent, Experts Say (SPACE.com)
Russia's botched Mars probe mission Phobos-Grunt is fast-approaching a fiery death, with just one or two days remaining before it falls from space, experts and Russian space officials say.
"The European Space Agency's current re-entry prediction for Phobos-Grunt ? points to the early evening (Central European Time) on Sunday, Jan.15, with an uncertainty of plus/minus five orbits," equal to plus or minus 7.5 hours, Heiner Klinkrad, head of the space debris office at ESA?s European Space Operations Centerin Darmstadt, Germany, told SPACE.com today (Jan. 14) in an email.
A statement today by Russia's Federal Space Agency (Roscosmos) also pegged Sunday as the crash day for Phobos-Grunt, but went even farther. According to the statement, released in Russian, the 14-ton spacecraft filled with fuel is expected to fall on Jan. 15 and may crash in the Pacific Ocean, off the coast of Chile.
The translation of the statement and map released by Russian space officials depict the potential crash time as occurring at about 2151 GMT (4:51 p.m. EST),? although major uncertainties still remain. There is a chance the spacecraft could fall earlier in the day, or later on Monday, Jan. 16.
Falling Russian Mars probe
ESA, among a host of other space agencies and organizations, has been closely monitoring the decay of the doomed Russian spacecraft. [Infographic: The Fall of Russia's Doomed Phobos-Grunt]
Russian space agency officials have reported that they expect that, at most, about 20 to 30 fragments of Phobos-Grunt may survive the fiery re-entry and reach Earth's surface.
But given that most of the Earth's surface is covered with water, the odds that these leftovers ? a predicted total mass of less than 440 pounds (200 kilograms) ? would fall onto dry land is very small, scientists have said.
Russia launched the Phobos-Grunt mission into space on Nov. 8 (Nov. 9 Moscow time). The spacecraft was designed to fly to Phobos, one of two moons circling Mars.
Once at Phobos, the space probe was expected to collect samples from the Martian moon and then return them to Earth in 2014. However, shortly after launch, the spacecraft failed to boost itself out of Earth orbit to begin the trip to Mars.
Packed with toxic fuel
One unique aspect of the Phobos-Grunt re-entry is its large cache of onboard fuel.
While the dry mass of the wayward satellite is just 2.5 tons, the probe totes about 11 tons of toxic propellant, unused when the craft became marooned in Earth orbit and not outbound to Mars. [Photos of the Phobos-Grunt Mars Mission]
Orbital debris experts suggest that Phobos-Grunt's fuel tanks, reportedly made of aluminum that contains the unsymmetrical dimethylhydrazine (UDMH), will explode high above the Earth. Those heat-succumbing tanks would therefore release the load of propellant to burn up in Earth's atmosphere.
"The 'it just burns up' issue remains invisible frankly," said Martin Ross, Director of The Aerospace Corporation's Center for Launch Emissions and Atmospheric Research in El Segundo, Calif.??
"What is needed is a full accounting of the material that gets vaporized and re-condenses into small particles that may remain in the upper atmosphere for many years," Ross told SPACE.com. "Some of these particles may influence chemistry, since the vaporized materials are exotic in some cases, in that region of the atmosphere in subtle ways. It remains a question mark," he said.
Flying in space is hard
Phobos-Grunt is also outfitted with a nose-cone shaped descent vehicle wrapped in a thermal protection system. It was meant to haul back to Earth samples collected at Phobos. That hardware was designed to sky dive through Earth?s atmosphere and hard land without parachute into the Sary Shagan missile test range in Kazakhstan ? if the Mars mission achieved success.
Nestled inside that re-entry sample capsule is the Planetary Society's tiny Living Interplanetary Flight Experiment (LIFE) biomodule that carries a select set of microorganisms.
"Trackers won't be able to predict where debris may fall until just a few hours before the event, so it?s impossible to say whether the biomodule will be recovered," Planetary Society officials explained in a statement on Jan. 13.
?What we?ve seen is heartbreaking reinforcement of an oft-repeated maxim. Space is hard! We are disappointed that our remarkable test of the hardiness of living organisms will not get the 34 months in deep space we had hoped for," said the Planetary Society's Chief Executive Officer Bill Nye, also known as Bill Nye the Science Guy.
"We also offer our condolences to the China National Space Administration; it's their first Mars mission and a disappointment," Nye added.
Like LIFE, China's Yinghuo-1 orbiter hoped to catch a ride to Mars on Phobos-Grunt in order to study the Red Planet.
Russia's satellite crash past
The former Soviet Union (USSR), and now Russia, has a bit of history regarding satellites falling from space and tumbling onto land.
Due to a propulsion system failure, the Cosmos 954 spacecraft ? a Soviet nuclear-powered Radar Ocean Reconnaissance Satellite ? fell into Canada's Northwest Territories in January 1978. It had only been in space for four months.
Large amounts of radioactive material from the satellite's fall was scattered from Great Slave Lake into northern Saskatchewan and Alberta.
Subsequently, a joint U.S.-Canadian clean-up operation picked up roughly 0.1 percent of Cosmos 954's power source. The spacecraft's nuclear reactor worked on uranium, enriched with isotope of uranium-235.
Liability for damage
Canadian authorities determined that all but two of the Cosmos 954 fragments recovered were radioactive. Some fragments located proved to be of lethal radioactivity.
The spacecraft's plummet into Canada also marked the first time that the adjudicative process built into the United Nation's Convention on International Liability for Damage Caused by Space Objects was put to the test.
Canada claims from the USSR added up to more than $6 million. In the end, in 1981, the Soviet Union coughed up $3 million to settle the Canadian claim of reimbursement.
Unlike the Cosmos satellite, Russia's Phobos-Grunt is a solar-powered spacecraft. One instrument on the probe does carry a small amount of the radioactive element cobalt-57.
However, Lev Zelenyi, director of the Space Research Institute in Moscow and chairman of the Russian Academy of Sciences? Solar System Exploration Board, has stated that the amount contained in that instrument is less than 10 micrograms and no significant problems are anticipated.
Standby alert
Meanwhile, as Phobos-Grunt draws closer and closer to its fiery finale, a worldwide team of skywatchers is on standby alert in the hopes of spotting the fall.
"Experienced observers know that the probability of seeing any given satellite re-entry is very small, so they maintain very low expectations," said Toronto, Canada-based Ted Molczan, a leader in the citizen network of observers.
"Those who are keen to observe one [a re-entry of space hardware] will monitor the trend in the decay estimates," Molczan told SPACE.com.
"If it appears that re-entry will occur at about the time Earth?s rotation drags their location through the plane of the orbit, then they may go out and have a look, still fully expecting to see nothing, but knowing they have maximized their personal odds," Molczan said.
Leonard David has been reporting on the space industry for more than five decades. He is a winner of last year's National Space Club Press Award and a past editor-in-chief of the National Space Society's Ad Astra and Space World magazines. He has written for SPACE.com since 1999.
patriots broncos game gisele bundchen saints willis mcgahee willis mcgahee new orleans saints ship aground off italy
Monday, January 16, 2012
Labs Size Up New Guidelines For Rodent Cages
Tom Gannam/AP New advice on housing lab rodents has left research centers confused about compliance and worried about the costs.
Scientists do experiments with millions of rats and mice each year, to study everything from heart disease to cancer to diabetes. Recently, some new recommendations about how to house female lab rodents and their babies caused an uproar, with experts at major research institutions now saying they're unsure of what they'll have to do to keep their government funding.
The importance of what we're talking about is the uncertainty of what this is going to do to us.
The new recommendations appear in the bible of lab animal care, officially called The Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. All research funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) must comply with this guide, which was just revised for the first time since 1996.
There are a lot of changes in this edition of the guide, but the one that has the research world in a tizzy appears on page 57. It's a chart that lays out new recommendations for the minimum number of square inches of floor space that should be used to house female rodents and their babies.
It says a female mouse plus her litter should get at least 51 square inches, while a female rat plus her litter gets at least 124 square inches.
Lab animal experts are worried that this means they won't be able to do certain kinds of rodent breeding in their institutions' existing cages.
Major Changes To Keep Government Funding
And that's no small matter for places like Johns Hopkins University, a research powerhouse and the largest recipient of funding from the NIH. The university's main housing facility for rats and mice is nearly the size of a football field, with many rodents genetically altered and bred for specific kinds of research.
The facility has around 40 rooms, each of which holds about 1,000 clear plastic cages that are the size of shoe boxes; they fit into special racks that line the walls.
Enlarge Courtesy of Joseph Thulin/Biomedical Resource Center, Medical College of Wisconsin The standard rat cage used in the U.S. (right) has 140 square inches of floor space. One interpretation of the new guidelines says this cage wouldn't be big enough to hold a male rat, a female rat and their babies. Instead, labs would have to house the rat family in a larger cage, like the 210-square-inch one on the left.
Courtesy of Joseph Thulin/Biomedical Resource Center, Medical College of WisconsinThe standard rat cage used in the U.S. (right) has 140 square inches of floor space. One interpretation of the new guidelines says this cage wouldn't be big enough to hold a male rat, a female rat and their babies. Instead, labs would have to house the rat family in a larger cage, like the 210-square-inch one on the left.
If each cage contains one to five mice, says Bob Adams, the veterinarian in charge of this facility, that means his staff cares for around 200,000 rodents.
Each cage has its own ventilation and water supply, and the scientists who keep their rodents here pay a rent of 62.5 cents per cage per day.
To explain his concerns with the new guidelines, Adams pulls out one cage. Hairless pink babies squirm in one corner. There's a tangle of adults with dark fur over by the water valve. Adams says there's probably a male in here with a harem. One male plus two or more females can produce lots of mice quickly.
But as Adams interprets the new guidelines, this would no longer be possible in this shoe box-sized cage. The guide seems to say that its 75 square inches is big enough only for one mother and her babies, plus one other adult.
Adams is worried that Johns Hopkins may have to make major changes to keep its government funding.
"The effect would be, we would have to buy more of this caging, and our estimate was somewhere around $300,000 worth of caging, at least," he says.
He'd also have to find a place to put all those cages, and then hire more staff to manage them and wash them. "Bottom line is, there is more work, there is more cost for everybody, for our whole operation," he says.
Push Back From Research Institutions
Across the country, other research institutions looked at the new guide and came to the same conclusion. The National Association for Biomedical Research estimated that nationwide, implementing the new space guidelines for breeding rodents would likely cost hundreds of millions of dollars ? money that then couldn't be used on research. Government regulators have been deluged with letters of protest.
One of them came from the Medical College of Wisconsin, which has one of the largest academic colonies of research rats in the world. Joseph Thulin, director of the college's biomedical resource center, says that animal welfare is important, but it's unclear that the new guidelines will result in any benefits.
"I would not want anyone to think that the research community doesn't want to implement new guidelines because they don't care about their animals. That is not the case at all," says Thulin. He says it's just that there's been very little research on rodent housing, and there's no evidence to support the idea that increasing the cage space in the way that's been recommended "will have any measurable positive impact on the animals."
Meanwhile, the people who actually wrote the new recommendations say all this concern is the result of a big misunderstanding.
"Certainly I personally was very surprised at the reaction or at the way some people were interpreting what was written," says Janet Garber, a consultant who chaired the committee of independent experts convened by the National Research Council to revise the animal care guidebook.
The old version had no specific guidance on how to prevent overcrowding when breeding rodents, and the panel simply thought it would be helpful to set some benchmarks. Garber says the numbers in the chart are not hard-and-fast rules, and research institutions have to look at their individual situations.
"There are very, very few requirements in the guide. There are very few 'musts' in the guide," Garber says. "And certainly within the context of these housing recommendations, they are in fact recommendations. Yes, they're minimum recommendations, but they're a starting point."
That's the position taken by the NIH. Patricia Brown, director of its lab animal welfare office, said in an email that she and her office "were surprised by the concerns," and that their experience was that labs currently house their rodents appropriately.
A statement on the NIH website indicates it still will be possible to put more breeding rodents in a cage than the guide recommends. And researchers say, that is somewhat reassuring.
Ambiguity And Uncertainty
But it won't be business as usual. Because the NIH statement goes on to say that if scientists want to do that, they'll have to justify it, and show that things like the animals' health or behavior won't suffer.
Plus, the government warns that "blanket, program-wide departures from the Guide for reasons of convenience, cost, or other non-animal welfare considerations are not acceptable."
All of that has left some experts confused. "I guess the importance of what we're talking about is the uncertainty of what this is going to do to us," says Adams, the Johns Hopkins veterinarian.
He points out that researchers have to meet the government's standards to safeguard their funding. So should the university shell out the money for more cages, when science budgets are already tight? Or try justifying their current practices to see if they're accepted? "We're going to have to thrash this out and see, how do we interpret this now?" Adams says.
All of this ambiguity has also displeased some animal welfare activists ? for a different reason. They feel that researchers shouldn't have been given an out.
Kathleen Conlee with the Humane Society of the United States says overcrowding can be a real problem. Conlee says officials need to carefully scrutinize any efforts to breed rodents in less space.
"If we are going to be using millions or tens of millions of rodents in this country, we do have an obligation to the welfare of these animals and hope that the National Institutes of Health will strictly enforce their recommendations in the guide," she says.
The National Institutes of Health is taking comments on the rodent housing issue until the end of the month. And research institutions have about a year to evaluate their program and decide whether they need to make changes to comply with the new guidelines.
Source: http://www.npr.org/2012/01/16/145172737/labs-size-up-new-guidelines-for-rodent-cages?ft=1&f=1007
time magazine person of the year time magazine person of the year la clippers verizon galaxy nexus verizon galaxy nexus lawrence lessig lawrence lessig
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)